Bombard v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Co.
675 N.E.2d 467, 89 N.Y.2d 854, 652 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 4260
This text of 675 N.E.2d 467 (Bombard v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bombard v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Co., 675 N.E.2d 467, 89 N.Y.2d 854, 652 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 4260 (N.Y. 1996).
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying appellant’s motion to amend his complaint, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
675 N.E.2d 467, 89 N.Y.2d 854, 652 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 4260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bombard-v-central-hudson-gas-electric-co-ny-1996.