Bomar v. Director of Revenue

278 S.W.3d 713, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1497, 2009 WL 791495
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 24, 2009·No. ED 91161·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Derek D. Bomar appeals the trial court’s judgment upholding the Director of Revenue’s revocation of his driver’s license pursuant to Section 302.505 RSMo (2007). Bomar argues that the arresting officer lacked probable cause to arrest him because he was not driving the car and his car was not on a public highway at the time of arrest.

We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). Ai opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memoran-

*714 dum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bomar v. Director of Revenue, 278 S.W.3d 713, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1497, 2009 WL 791495 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

278 S.W.3d 713 (Bomar v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)