Bolus A. D. v. Sec'y of Homeland Sec.

376 F. Supp. 3d 959
CourtDistrict Court, D. Maine
DecidedApril 29, 2019
DocketCase No. 18-cv-1557 (WMW/KMM)
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 376 F. Supp. 3d 959 (Bolus A. D. v. Sec'y of Homeland Sec.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bolus A. D. v. Sec'y of Homeland Sec., 376 F. Supp. 3d 959 (D. Me. 2019).

Opinion

Based on the foregoing analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED :

1. The February 11, 2019 R & R of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez, (Dkt. 33), is ADOPTED AS MODIFIED .

2. Petitioner Bolus A. D.'s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, (Dkt. 1), is GRANTED IN PART as addressed herein.

3. Within 30 days of this Order, an immigration judge shall hold a bond hearing at which the immigration judge shall make an individualized determination as to whether detention is necessary because Petitioner Bolus A. D. presents a risk of flight, a danger to the community, or both.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Untitled Case
W.D. Oklahoma, 2026
Parada Calderon v. Bostock
W.D. Washington, 2025
Jalloh v. Garland
W.D. Oklahoma, 2023
Mohamed v. Garland
D. Minnesota, 2022
Banyee v. Garland
D. Minnesota, 2021
Mohamed v. Barr
D. Minnesota, 2020
Abi v. Barr
D. Minnesota, 2019
Salad v. Whitaker
D. Minnesota, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
376 F. Supp. 3d 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolus-a-d-v-secy-of-homeland-sec-med-2019.