Bolus A. D. v. Sec'y of Homeland Sec.

D. Maine

Bolus A. D. v. Sec'y of Homeland Sec.

376 F. Supp. 3d 959

District Court, D. Maine·Decided April 29, 2019·No. Case No. 18-cv-1557 (WMW/KMM)·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Based on the foregoing analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED :

1. The February 11, 2019 R & R of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez, (Dkt. 33), is ADOPTED AS MODIFIED .

2. Petitioner Bolus A. D.'s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, (Dkt. 1), is GRANTED IN PART as addressed herein.

3. Within 30 days of this Order, an immigration judge shall hold a bond hearing at which the immigration judge shall make an individualized determination as to whether detention is necessary because Petitioner Bolus A. D. presents a risk of flight, a danger to the community, or both.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Based on the foregoing analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED :

1. The February 11, 2019 R & R of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez, (Dkt. 33), is ADOPTED AS MODIFIED .

2. Petitioner Bolus A. D.'s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, (Dkt. 1), is GRANTED IN PART as addressed herein.

3. Within 30 days of this Order, an immigration judge shall hold a bond hearing at which the immigration judge shall make an individualized determination as to whether detention is necessary because Petitioner Bolus A. D. presents a risk of flight, a danger to the community, or both.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Bolus A. D. v. Sec'y of Homeland Sec., 376 F. Supp. 3d 959 (D. Me. 2019).

Pincite

376 F. Supp. 3d 959 (Bolus A. D. v. Sec'y of Homeland Sec.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related