Bolufe v. Ramirez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bolufe v. Ramirez

626 So. 2d 286, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11120, 1993 WL 442476

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 2, 1993

DocketNo. 92-639

StatusPublished

This text of 626 So. 2d 286 (Bolufe v. Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bolufe v. Ramirez, 626 So. 2d 286, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11120, 1993 WL 442476 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the trial court properly granted a new trial because of the golden rule arguments made by defense counsel below. Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959); Miku v. Olmen, 193 So.2d 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966), cert. denied, 201 So.2d 232 (Fla.1967).

There is no merit in the point raised on cross appeal. See § 627.7262, Fla.Stat. (1991) (renumbered § 627.4136, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1992)),

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the trial court properly granted a new trial because of the golden rule arguments made by defense counsel below. Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959); Miku v. Olmen, 193 So.2d 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966), cert. denied, 201 So.2d 232 (Fla.1967).

There is no merit in the point raised on cross appeal. See § 627.7262, Fla.Stat. (1991) (renumbered § 627.4136, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1992)),

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

626 So. 2d 286, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11120, 1993 WL 442476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolufe-v-ramirez-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack