Bolton v. White
3 F. Cas. 820, 2 D.C. 426, 2 Cranch 426
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedOctober 15, 1823
StatusPublished
This text of 3 F. Cas. 820 (Bolton v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bolton v. White, 3 F. Cas. 820, 2 D.C. 426, 2 Cranch 426 (circtddc 1823).
Opinion
at first, doubted whether Mr. Marbury could be heard, as he did not appear for any party in the cause ; and requested him to ascertain what had been the practice in the courts of Maryland.
He afterwards produced the case of Campbell v. Morris et al., in Harris & M’Henry’s Reports ; and the Court permitted him to make the suggestion ; and quashed the attachment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 F. Cas. 820, 2 D.C. 426, 2 Cranch 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolton-v-white-circtddc-1823.