Bolton v. State

129 So. 311, 23 Ala. App. 573, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 180
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bolton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 Ala. App. 470
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 24, 1930·No. 8 Div. 935.·Published

Opinion

RICE, J.

We are unable to find even a scintilla of evidence, in the record before us, that this appellant did anything more than be present at a still where whisky was being made unlawfully. Under the statutes, as construed by the uniform decisions of this court, merely being present at a still where whisky is being illegally manufactured is no offense. Dickey v. State, 22 Ala. App. 375, 115 So. 848; Burnett v. State, 21 Ala. App. 274, 107 So. 321, and cases cited in the opinion in sarne.

For the error in refusing to give at appellant’s request, the general affirmative charge in his favor, the judgment of conviction is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bolton v. State, 129 So. 311, 23 Ala. App. 573, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 180 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

129 So. 311 (Bolton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dickey v. State
115 So. 848 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1928)
Burnett v. State
107 So. 321 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926)