Bolton v. Lima Toledo Rd. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Bolton v. Lima Toledo Rd. Co.

172 N.E. 306, 121 Ohio St. 620, 121 Ohio St. (N.S.) 620, 1929 Ohio LEXIS 249

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 27, 1929

Docket21787

StatusPublished

This text of 172 N.E. 306 (Bolton v. Lima Toledo Rd. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bolton v. Lima Toledo Rd. Co., 172 N.E. 306, 121 Ohio St. 620, 121 Ohio St. (N.S.) 620, 1929 Ohio LEXIS 249 (Ohio 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

It appearing that the Judges of the Court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of the case, one of the Judges not participating, and are unable for that reason to agree upon a judgment, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Kinkade, Robinson and Jones, JJ., concur. Matthias, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the Judges of the Court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of the case, one of the Judges not participating, and are unable for that reason to agree upon a judgment, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Kinkade, Robinson and Jones, JJ., concur. Matthias, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 N.E. 306, 121 Ohio St. 620, 121 Ohio St. (N.S.) 620, 1929 Ohio LEXIS 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolton-v-lima-toledo-rd-co-ohio-1929.