Bolton v. Lawrence

9 Wend. 435
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1832·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

[437]*437By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The revised statutes have not altered the law as to the right of sheriffs to poundage in a case like the present. The provision on this subject is substantially the same as it was in the former statutes, and under them it has been uniformly held since Hildreth v. Ellice, 1 Caines, 192, that after a levy of an execution and satisfaction of the judgment, the sheriff is entitled to poundage, although he do not sell the property levied upon. Nor does the statute authorizing plaintiffs to issue executions to different counties at the same time, change the law from what it was before ; a plaintiff always had the right to do so, subject to the peril of paying sheriff’s fees upon every execution except that upon which the money was actually collected. The motion for re-taxation is denied. 4 Wendell, 479. 6 id. 536.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bolton v. Lawrence, 9 Wend. 435 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1832).

9 Wend. 435 (Bolton v. Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. Siglin
10 Or. 93 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1882)
German American Bank v. Morris Run Coal Co.
68 N.Y. 585 (New York Court of Appeals, 1877)
Campbell v. . Cothran
56 N.Y. 279 (New York Court of Appeals, 1874)
Campbel v. Cothran
11 N.Y. 279 (New York Court of Appeals, 1874)
Dole v. New York Central Railroad
12 Abb. Pr. 385 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1872)
Morse v. Gibbons
43 Cal. 377 (California Supreme Court, 1872)
Calhoun v. Lee
29 How. Pr. 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1865)
Parsons v. Bowdoin
17 Wend. 14 (New York Supreme Court, 1837)