Bolton v. Kelly & Sons

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bolton v. Kelly & Sons

123 S.E. 916, 32 Ga. App. 479, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 479

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 14, 1924

Docket15208

StatusPublished

This text of 123 S.E. 916 (Bolton v. Kelly & Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bolton v. Kelly & Sons, 123 S.E. 916, 32 Ga. App. 479, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 479 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

The inference is authorized that a landlord obligated himself to pay for supplies furnished to a tenant on his farm and charged to the landlord, where the landlord told the merchant furnishing the supplies that the tenant, who had bought a bill of goods of the merchant, had been sent to the merchant by the landlord, and that “it would be all right to let him have goods, but not let him have too much,” and where statements of the goods so furnished had from time to time been sent to the landlord and he had paid no attention to the statements, and where the landlord had. previously paid a bill for supplies furnished to the same tenant by the same merchant on a previous occasion, and which was charged to the landlord.

Judgmbnt affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

The inference is authorized that a landlord obligated himself to pay for supplies furnished to a tenant on his farm and charged to the landlord, where the landlord told the merchant furnishing the supplies that the tenant, who had bought a bill of goods of the merchant, had been sent to the merchant by the landlord, and that “it would be all right to let him have goods, but not let him have too much,” and where statements of the goods so furnished had from time to time been sent to the landlord and he had paid no attention to the statements, and where the landlord had. previously paid a bill for supplies furnished to the same tenant by the same merchant on a previous occasion, and which was charged to the landlord.

Judgmbnt affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 S.E. 916, 32 Ga. App. 479, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolton-v-kelly-sons-gactapp-1924.