Bolton v. Burnett
5 Blackf. 222
Opinion
A SEALED note, executed by James A. Bolton ¿nd William Brown, was payable to William Burnett and Daniel Hankins. Hankins assigned his interest in the note to Burnett. Held, that the assignment was valid, and that Burnett might sustain a suit on the note against the makers in his own name. Sneed v. Mitchell, 1 Hayw. R. 289.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bolton v. Burnett, 5 Blackf. 222 (Ind. 1839).
5 Blackf. 222 (Bolton v. Burnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Garrison v. Clark
11 Ind. 369 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1858)