Bolton v. Burnett
5 Blackf. 222
This text of 5 Blackf. 222 (Bolton v. Burnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bolton v. Burnett, 5 Blackf. 222 (Ind. 1839).
Opinion
A SEALED note, executed by James A. Bolton ¿nd William Brown, was payable to William Burnett and Daniel Hankins. Hankins assigned his interest in the note to Burnett. Held, that the assignment was valid, and that Burnett might sustain a suit on the note against the makers in his own name. Sneed v. Mitchell, 1 Hayw. R. 289.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Garrison v. Clark
11 Ind. 369 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1858)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Blackf. 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolton-v-burnett-ind-1839.