Bolt v. State

150 S.W. 431, 67 Tex. Crim. 551, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 483
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 16, 1912·No. No. 1724.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

—Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of “unlawfully and seriously threatening to take the life of a human being, viz., Grover Rayburn.”

The testimony shows beyond a doubt that appellant made an unlawful and unjustifiable assault on Rayburn, but wholly fails to show a violation of article" 962 of the Criminal Code. It has been held by this court that a rash, inconsiderate expression, provoked by an angry altercation in which the parties were then engaged, will not constitute the offense. (March v. State, 3 Texas Crim. App., 107.) The most the testimony shows is that appellant perhaps made an unprovoked assault, and when prevented from again striking Rayburn, made an inconsiderate and harsh remark.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bolt v. State, 150 S.W. 431, 67 Tex. Crim. 551, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 483 (Tex. 1912).

150 S.W. 431 (Bolt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lane v. State
276 S.W. 712 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)