Bolt ex rel. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Joint Council Dining Car Employees

Fifth Circuit

Bolt ex rel. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Joint Council Dining Car Employees

301 F.2d 20

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 10, 1962

DocketNo. 19108

StatusPublished

This text of 301 F.2d 20 (Bolt ex rel. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Joint Council Dining Car Employees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bolt ex rel. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Joint Council Dining Car Employees, 301 F.2d 20 (5th Cir. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The success of the appeal in this case must depend upon our finding that the trial court’s determination that action of the defendant Union, of which the appellants were members, was arbitrary or discriminatory against appellants and his class. To the contrary, we find that the evidence fully warranted the findings of the trial court and its conclusion to the effect that “The equities are with the Intervenor and the Union and against the plaintiff, and the defendant Union has the right to negotiate with the defendant Railroad for modification of the 1952 merger agreement.”

The judgment of the trial court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The success of the appeal in this case must depend upon our finding that the trial court’s determination that action of the defendant Union, of which the appellants were members, was arbitrary or discriminatory against appellants and his class. To the contrary, we find that the evidence fully warranted the findings of the trial court and its conclusion to the effect that “The equities are with the Intervenor and the Union and against the plaintiff, and the defendant Union has the right to negotiate with the defendant Railroad for modification of the 1952 merger agreement.”

The judgment of the trial court is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 F.2d 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolt-ex-rel-atlantic-coast-line-railroad-v-joint-council-dining-car-ca5-1962.