Bolster v. Mayor of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bolster v. Mayor of New York

38 N.Y.S. 1141, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 865

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 38 N.Y.S. 1141 (Bolster v. Mayor of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bolster v. Mayor of New York, 38 N.Y.S. 1141, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is within the principle of Foley v. Mayor, etc., 1 App. Div. 586, 37 N. Y. Supp. 465, and should be affirmed on the authority of that case. In that case, as in this, the plaintiff had been examined under the authority of section 123 of the consolidation act; but the parol notice given at the time of that examination was not thought to be sufficient notice of the intention to sue, to permit a recovery. The same rule must be applied here. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case is within the principle of Foley v. Mayor, etc., 1 App. Div. 586, 37 N. Y. Supp. 465, and should be affirmed on the authority of that case. In that case, as in this, the plaintiff had been examined under the authority of section 123 of the consolidation act; but the parol notice given at the time of that examination was not thought to be sufficient notice of the intention to sue, to permit a recovery. The same rule must be applied here. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 N.Y.S. 1141, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolster-v-mayor-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack