Bolotoff v. Sonotone Corp.

273 A.D. 818, 76 N.Y.S.2d 927, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4780

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff wife, and companion action by plaintiff husband for loss of services. Order granting in part and denying in part plaintiffs’ motion for an examination of the defendant by a named employee under a commission, upon written interrogatories, modified on the facts by inserting in the first ordering paragraph item 5. As thus modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. Item 5 was not opposed by the defendant and was proper in form. {Scheurenbrand v. Ferrizz, 262 App. Div. 1035; Foley v. Long Island B. B. Go., 242 App. Div. 780.) Its omission may have been due to inadvertence and could have been the subject of remedy by a motion for resettlement of the order. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Wenzel, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bolotoff v. Sonotone Corp., 273 A.D. 818, 76 N.Y.S.2d 927, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

273 A.D. 818 (Bolotoff v. Sonotone Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foley v. Long Island Railroad
242 A.D. 780 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Scheurenbrand v. Ferrizz
262 A.D. 1035 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)