Bolls v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners
This text of 464 F. App'x 131 (Bolls v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jonathan Bolls appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint challenging the constitutionality of the Appellee’s rules governing release of a failed applicant’s essay examination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bolls v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners, 811 F.Supp.2d 1260 (E.D.Va.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
464 F. App'x 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolls-v-virginia-board-of-bar-examiners-ca4-2012.