Bolls v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners

464 F. App'x 131
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 13, 2012·No. No. 11-2115·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Bolls appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint challenging the constitutionality of the Appellee’s rules governing release of a failed applicant’s essay examination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bolls v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners, 811 F.Supp.2d 1260 (E.D.Va.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bolls v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners, 464 F. App'x 131 (4th Cir. 2012).

464 F. App'x 131 (Bolls v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bolls v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners
811 F. Supp. 2d 1260 (E.D. Virginia, 2011)