Bolls v. Merit Systems Protection Board

56 F. App'x 921
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMarch 4, 2003
DocketNo. 02-3347
StatusPublished

This text of 56 F. App'x 921 (Bolls v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bolls v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 56 F. App'x 921 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Melvin Bolls, Jr. seeks review of the June 5, 2002, decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, No. AT3443020249-I-1, 92 M.S.P.R. 225, dismissing his appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Because the board lacks jurisdiction to review the Department of Labor’s workers’ compensation benefits decisions, we affirm.

A board decision must be affirmed unless it is found to be: “(1) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (2) obtained without procedures required by law, rule, or regulation having been followed; or (3) unsupported by substantial evidence.” 5 U.S.C. § 7703(c) (2000).

An award or denial of an award of workers’ compensation benefits by the Secretary of Labor is “(1) final and conclusive for all purposes and with respect to all questions of law and fact; and (2) not subject to review by another official of the United States or by a court by mandamus or otherwise.” 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b)(1), (2) (2000). Bolls asserts that his denial of workers’ compensation benefits is reviewable by the board under 5 C.F.R. § 1201.3(a)(7). Section 1201.3(a), however, provides board jurisdiction over appeals that are “authorized by law, rule, or regulation,” and it is not an independent source of jurisdiction. Accordingly, board review of his claim is precluded by section 8128.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 F. App'x 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolls-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2003.