Bollinger v. Bollinger

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bollinger v. Bollinger

188 S.W.3d 128, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 423, 2006 WL 851723

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 4, 2006

DocketED 85456

StatusPublished

This text of 188 S.W.3d 128 (Bollinger v. Bollinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bollinger v. Bollinger, 188 S.W.3d 128, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 423, 2006 WL 851723 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Glenda M. Bollinger (hereinafter, “Wife”) and Steven B. Bollinger (hereinafter, “Husband”) were married on September 22, 1978, and their marriage was dissolved on November 16, 2004. Wife appeals, claiming the trial court erred in dividing the marital property because the division was weighted too heavily in Husband’s favor and the trial court failed to divide some marital property.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. 1 The judgment is supported by substantial and competent evidence in the record and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. The joint motion taken with the case to dismiss this appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI