Bolling v. Virginia Department of Health

570 F. App'x 313
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 2, 2014·No. No. 13-2387·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Freda G. Bolling appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendant in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no re[314] versible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bolling v. Virginia Dep’t of Health, No. 3:12-cv-00593-REP-DJN (E.D.Va. Oct. 17, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bolling v. Virginia Department of Health, 570 F. App'x 313 (4th Cir. 2014).

570 F. App'x 313 (Bolling v. Virginia Department of Health) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.