Bolling v. State
Opinion
W. SHARP, Judge.
Bolling appeals from his judgment and sentences for unlawful sale or delivery of a controlled substance,1 and unlawful possession of a controlled substance.2 The state concedes that a scrivener’s error occurred in this case that should be corrected. At the plea hearing, Bolling entered a no contest plea to attempted unlawful sale or delivery of a controlled substance, a third degree felony,3 and unlawful possession of a controlled substance, a misdemeanor.4 Accordingly, we correct the written orders of adjudication of guilt and order of probation to reflect the lesser crimes, and in all other respects, we affirm.
AFFIRMED as corrected.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
664 So. 2d 1181 (Bolling v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.