Bolling v. State

664 So. 2d 1181, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13477, 1995 WL 765283
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bolling v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 631 So. 2d 310
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 1995·No. No. 95-1538·Published

Opinion

W. SHARP, Judge.

Bolling appeals from his judgment and sentences for unlawful sale or delivery of a controlled substance,1 and unlawful possession of a controlled substance.2 The state concedes that a scrivener’s error occurred in this case that should be corrected. At the plea hearing, Bolling entered a no contest plea to attempted unlawful sale or delivery of a controlled substance, a third degree felony,3 and unlawful possession of a controlled substance, a misdemeanor.4 Accordingly, we correct the written orders of adjudication of guilt and order of probation to reflect the lesser crimes, and in all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED as corrected.

PETERSON, C.J., and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bolling v. State, 664 So. 2d 1181, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13477, 1995 WL 765283 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

664 So. 2d 1181 (Bolling v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.