Bolles v. Hamilton County

74 F. 207, 20 C.C.A. 401, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1908
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedMay 7, 1896
DocketNo. 174
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 F. 207 (Bolles v. Hamilton County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bolles v. Hamilton County, 74 F. 207, 20 C.C.A. 401, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1908 (7th Cir. 1896).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an action of assumpsit upon coupons from bonus issued by the county of Hamilton, Ill., to the St. Louis & Southeastern Railway Company. Trial by jury was waived by written agreement, and the court made a general finding and gave judgment tor the plaintiff in error upon a part, but not upon all, of the coupons In suit. There is no special finding of fads, and in other respects also the record is the same as in the case of Woodbury V. City of Shawneetown. 71 Fed. 205. For the reasons there explained, no question is presented for consideration, and the judgment of the circuit court must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burrows v. Niblack
84 F. 111 (Seventh Circuit, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F. 207, 20 C.C.A. 401, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolles-v-hamilton-county-ca7-1896.