Bolles v. Bolles, No. Fa02-0561738s (Feb. 26, 2003)

Connecticut Superior Court

Bolles v. Bolles, No. Fa02-0561738s (Feb. 26, 2003)

2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 2478-bd

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided February 26, 2003·No. No. FA02-0561738S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION REGARDING MOTION FOR ARTICULATION The motion is granted and the court articulates as follows:

1. The mortgage referred to in the memorandum was Plaintiff's Exhibit 7, a mortgage from James Bolles to Clara Zirkenbach, in the original amount of $94,261.

2. The financial affidavits filed by the parties do not contain any entry in Section F, Insurance. There was not sufficient evidence presented to create a proper foundation for an order of life insurance. See Quindazzi v. Quindazzi, 56 Conn. App. 336 (2000).

3. The court did not intend to order the plaintiff to remove the defendant's name from the mortgage note and deed. The court did order the plaintiff to hold the defendant harmless from liabilities in connection with the encumbrances upon the property.

Domnarski, J. CT Page 2486

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION REGARDING MOTION FOR ARTICULATION The motion is granted and the court articulates as follows:

1. The mortgage referred to in the memorandum was Plaintiff's Exhibit 7, a mortgage from James Bolles to Clara Zirkenbach, in the original amount of $94,261.

2. The financial affidavits filed by the parties do not contain any entry in Section F, Insurance. There was not sufficient evidence presented to create a proper foundation for an order of life insurance. See Quindazzi v. Quindazzi, 56 Conn. App. 336 (2000).

3. The court did not intend to order the plaintiff to remove the defendant's name from the mortgage note and deed. The court did order the plaintiff to hold the defendant harmless from liabilities in connection with the encumbrances upon the property.

Domnarski, J. CT Page 2486

Bolles v. Bolles, No. Fa02-0561738s (Feb. 26, 2003), 2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 2478-bd (Colo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 2478-bd (Bolles v. Bolles, No. Fa02-0561738s (Feb. 26, 2003)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related