Boller v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Boller v. State

475 S.W.3d 208, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1102, 2015 WL 6468198

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 27, 2015·No. WD 77675·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam

Larry Boiler appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion following an Alford plea to two charges of .possession of child pornography. Boiler contends his plea counsel was ineffective in providing him false information regarding the consequences of his plea and failing, to interview potential witnesses. For reasons explained. in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment,

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per Curiam

Larry Boiler appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion following an Alford plea to two charges of .possession of child pornography. Boiler contends his plea counsel was ineffective in providing him false information regarding the consequences of his plea and failing, to interview potential witnesses. For reasons explained. in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment,

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Boller v. State, 475 S.W.3d 208, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1102, 2015 WL 6468198 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

475 S.W.3d 208 (Boller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.