Bollenbach v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 266
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 21, 1959
DocketNo. 62699; protest 272621-K/7625 (Chicago)
StatusPublished

This text of 42 Cust. Ct. 266 (Bollenbach v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bollenbach v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 266 (cusc 1959).

Opinion

[267]*267Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the barometer movements in issue are machines, not specially provided for, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 Cust. Ct. 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bollenbach-v-united-states-cusc-1959.