Bolle v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Bolle v. State

14 Ind. 376

DecidedJune 7, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 14 Ind. 376 (Bolle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bolle v. State, 14 Ind. 376 (Ind. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Meleti Bolle filed before a justice of the peace an affidavit for surety of the peace against certain parties, who were' brought before the justice, and by him recognized to appear before the Court of Common Pleas. In the Common Pleas, on the cause being called, Meleti failed to appear; whereupon, the record reciting that “said Meleti Bolle being married, and the wife of Joseph Bolle” judgment was rendered against Joseph Bolle for costs.

This judgment against Joseph Bolle for costs was wrong, in our opinion, and must be reversed.

The judgment against Joseph Bolle is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Meleti Bolle filed before a justice of the peace an affidavit for surety of the peace against certain parties, who were' brought before the justice, and by him recognized to appear before the Court of Common Pleas. In the Common Pleas, on the cause being called, Meleti failed to appear; whereupon, the record reciting that “said Meleti Bolle being married, and the wife of Joseph Bolle” judgment was rendered against Joseph Bolle for costs.

This judgment against Joseph Bolle for costs was wrong, in our opinion, and must be reversed.

The judgment against Joseph Bolle is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Ind. 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolle-v-state-ind-1860.