Bollard v. California Province of the Society of Jesus

211 F.3d 1331, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3575, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 4817, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8866, 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1566, 2000 WL 545051
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 5, 2000
DocketNo. 98-16194
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 211 F.3d 1331 (Bollard v. California Province of the Society of Jesus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bollard v. California Province of the Society of Jesus, 211 F.3d 1331, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3575, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 4817, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8866, 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1566, 2000 WL 545051 (9th Cir. 2000).

Opinions

ORDER DENYING REHEARING

The panel, as constituted above, has voted unanimously to deny the petitions for rehearing. Judge W. Fletcher voted to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc, and Judges Thompson and Mollway so recommended.

A judge of the court called for a vote on the petitions for rehearing en banc. A vote was taken, and a majority of the active judges of the court failed to vote for en banc rehearing. Fed. RApp. P. 35(f).

The petitions for rehearing and the petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 F.3d 1331, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3575, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 4817, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8866, 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1566, 2000 WL 545051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bollard-v-california-province-of-the-society-of-jesus-ca9-2000.