Bollack v. Societe Generale Pour Favoriser Le
56 N.E.2d 253, 293 N.Y. 652, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2074
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs, and question certified answered in the negative on the ground that the issues are of such nature and scope as to indicate the propriety of a trial thereof. No opinion.
Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ. Taking no part: RIPPEY, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bollack v. Societe Generale Pour Favoriser Le, 56 N.E.2d 253, 293 N.Y. 652, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2074 (N.Y. 1944).
56 N.E.2d 253 (Bollack v. Societe Generale Pour Favoriser Le) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Klein v. Lynch
17 Misc. 2d 917 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)