Bolkum v. Staab
370 A.2d 225, 134 Vt. 627, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 885
This text of 370 A.2d 225 (Bolkum v. Staab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bolkum v. Staab, 370 A.2d 225, 134 Vt. 627, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 885 (Vt. 1976).
Opinion
Appellants’ motion for a stay pending appeal is denied, for the reason that the cause is not properly before this Court on direct appeal under V.R.A.P. 3, defendants’ remedy, if any, being under V.R.A.P. 21.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
370 A.2d 225, 134 Vt. 627, 1976 Vt. LEXIS 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolkum-v-staab-vt-1976.