Boling v. United States

699 F. App'x 212
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 20, 2017
DocketNo. 17-6784
StatusPublished

This text of 699 F. App'x 212 (Boling v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boling v. United States, 699 F. App'x 212 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Oliver M. Boling, a District of Columbia prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing without prejudice Boling’s complaint under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (2012), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boling v. United States, No. 4:17-cv-01097-CMC, 2017 WL 2457306 (D.S.C. June 7, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
699 F. App'x 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boling-v-united-states-ca4-2017.