Boling v. Boling

Ohio Supreme Court

Boling v. Boling

91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 390

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 1, 1914

DocketNo. 14068

StatusPublished

This text of 91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 390 (Boling v. Boling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boling v. Boling, 91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 390 (Ohio 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed.

See journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed;jthis court being of the opinion that the insolvency court having granted [391]*391a decree of divorce on the petition of plaintiff in error and having overruled the motion of defendant in error to set aside said decree, neither the insolvency court nor the circuit court had jurisdiction to entertain an application thereafter filed in that case by defendant in error for alimony.

It is therefore ordered that the motion of defendant in error for alimony be dismissed.

Nichols, C. J., Shauck, Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker and Newman, JJ., concur. Wilkin, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed.

See journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed;jthis court being of the opinion that the insolvency court having granted [391]*391a decree of divorce on the petition of plaintiff in error and having overruled the motion of defendant in error to set aside said decree, neither the insolvency court nor the circuit court had jurisdiction to entertain an application thereafter filed in that case by defendant in error for alimony.

It is therefore ordered that the motion of defendant in error for alimony be dismissed.

Nichols, C. J., Shauck, Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker and Newman, JJ., concur. Wilkin, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boling-v-boling-ohio-1914.