Boling v. Barnes
This text of 225 So. 2d 510 (Boling v. Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By petition for writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District reported at 216 So.2d 804, which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this Court and other District Courts of Appeal.
Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and merits.
After a thorough consideration of the petition and record we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, that the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 So. 2d 510, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boling-v-barnes-fla-1969.