Bolin v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)
This text of Bolin v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) (Bolin v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 STEPHEN J. BOLIN, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00553-ART -CSD
4 Plaintiff Order
5 v. Re: ECF Nos. 1, 1-1
6 OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 7 Defendant 8
9 Plaintiff has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) (ECF No. 1) and pro 10 se complaint (ECF No. 1-1). 11 A person may be granted permission to proceed IFP if the person “submits an affidavit 12 that includes a statement of all assets such [person] possesses [and] that the person is unable to 13 pay such fees or give security therefor. Such affidavit shall state the nature of the action, defense 14 or appeal and affiant’s belief that the person is entitled to redress.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1); Lopez 15 v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (stating that 28 U.S.C. § 1915 applies to 16 all actions filed IFP, not just prisoner actions). 17 The Local Rules of Practice for the District of Nevada provide: “Any person who is 18 unable to prepay the fees in a civil case may apply to the court for authority to proceed [IFP]. 19 The application must be made on the form provided by the court and must include a financial 20 affidavit disclosing the applicant’s income, assets, expenses, and liabilities.” LSR 1-1. 21 “[T]he supporting affidavits [must] state the facts as to [the] affiant’s poverty with some 22 particularity, definiteness and certainty.” U.S. v. McQuade, 647 F.2d 938, 940 (9th Cir. 1981) 23 1 (quotation marks and citation omitted). A litigant need not “be absolutely destitute to enjoy the 2 benefits of the statute.” Adkins v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948). 3 A review of the application to proceed IFP reveals Plaintiff cannot pay the filing fee; 4 therefore, the application is granted.
5 Plaintiff has filed a complaint under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) against the 6 Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Plaintiff alleges that he sent a FOIA request to the 7 agency for certain records, and the agency refused to process the request. 8 FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, provides that upon receiving a request for records, an agency must 9 determine within 20 days whether to comply with the request "and shall immediately notify the 10 person making such request of-- (I) such determination and the reasons therefor; (II) the right of 11 such person to seek assistance from the FOIA Public Liaison of the agency; and (III) in the case 12 of an adverse determination" of the right to appeal to the head of the agency and seek dispute 13 resolution services. 5 U.S.C. § 552(6)(A)(i). If the agency fails to comply, "a FOIA requester can 14 proceed directly to district court where the agency must show 'exceptional circumstances'
15 justifying its untimeliness and due diligence in remedying the violation." Hajro v. U.S. 16 Citizenship and Immigration Services, 811 F.3d 1086, 1092 (9th Cir. 2016) (citing 5 U.S.C. § 17 552(6)(C)). 18 Liberally construing the pro se pleading, the court finds Plaintiff states a colorable claim 19 for relief under FOIA. 20 CONCLUSION 21 (1) Plaintiff’s IFP application (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED. 22 (2) The Clerk shall FILE the Complaint (ECF No. 1-1). 23 1 (3) The Complaint shall PROCEED against the Office of the Director of National 2 Intelligence. 3 (4) The Clerk of Court shall ISSUE a summons for the Defendant and: 4 (a) SEND a copy of the summons and the complaint to the United States Attorney
5 for the District of Nevada, 401 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 1100, Las Vegas, NV 6 89101. 7 (b) SEND a copy of the summons and complaint by registered or certified mail to 8 the civil -process clerk at the United States Attorney’s Office at 401 Las Vegas Blvd. 9 South, Suite 1100, Las Vegas, NV 89101. 10 (c) SEND a copy of the summons and complaint by registered or certified mail to 11 the Attorney General of the United States at 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington 12 D.C. 20530; and 13 (d) SEND a copy of the summons and complaint to the Office of the Director of 14 National Intelligence, Washington D.C. 20511.
15 (5) Plaintiff shall serve upon defendant(s) or, if an appearance has been entered by 16 counsel, upon the attorney(s), a copy of every pleading, motion or other document submitted for 17 consideration by the court. If Plaintiff electronically files a document with the court’s electronic 18 filing system, no certificate of service is required. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1)(B); LR IC 4-1(b); LR 19 5-1. If Plaintiff mails the document to the court, Plaintiff shall include with the original 20 document submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the 21 document was mailed to the defendants or counsel for the defendants. If counsel has entered a 22 notice of appearance, Plaintiff shall direct service to the individual attorney named in the notice 23 of appearance, at the physical or electronic address stated therein. The court may disregard any 1}| document received by a district judge or magistrate judge which has not been filed with the Clerk, and any document received by a district judge, magistrate judge, or the Clerk which fails to include a certificate showing proper service when required. 4) 1T IS SO ORDERED. 5 6|| Dated: December 17, 2024 CS Or Craig S. Denney 8 United States MagiStrate Judge 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bolin v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolin-v-office-of-the-director-of-national-intelligence-odni-nvd-2024.