Bolin v. Maxwell

173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 517
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 5, 1962
DocketNo. 37445
StatusPublished

This text of 173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 517 (Bolin v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bolin v. Maxwell, 173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 517 (Ohio 1962).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Petitioner contends that, since he was found not guilty on count two and was found guilty only on count one [518]*518which this court held did not state an offense, he is entitled to release from custody.

Petitioner has an adequate remedy by way of appeal to the Court of Appeals from the judgment of conviction to review the error of which he complains, and this court will not entertain a review of such judgment by a proceeding in habeas corpus. See State v. Wosniak, supra (172 Ohio St., 517), 522.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Matthias and Bell, JJ., dissent. Herbert, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolin-v-maxwell-ohio-1962.