Bolin v. Bolin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bolin v. Bolin

648 So. 2d 1264, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 628, 1995 WL 36163

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 1, 1995

DocketNo. 93-3164

StatusPublished

This text of 648 So. 2d 1264 (Bolin v. Bolin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bolin v. Bolin, 648 So. 2d 1264, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 628, 1995 WL 36163 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of dissolution of marriage in all respects except for the refusal of the trial court to consider the husband’s motion for modification of temporary relief.

Over 3 years prior to trial, and a few months after the entry of a temporary relief order, the husband moved to modify based on a substantial reduction of his income. Subsequently, the husband renewed his request for modification and again sought to have it heard at trial. The court’s refusal to consider this request was an error. Compagnoni v. Compagnoni, 619 So.2d 450 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). We therefore reverse that portion of the judgment establishing the ar-rearage for reconsideration after the court hears the motion for modification.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

DELL, C.J., GUNTHER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of dissolution of marriage in all respects except for the refusal of the trial court to consider the husband’s motion for modification of temporary relief.

Over 3 years prior to trial, and a few months after the entry of a temporary relief order, the husband moved to modify based on a substantial reduction of his income. Subsequently, the husband renewed his request for modification and again sought to have it heard at trial. The court’s refusal to consider this request was an error. Compagnoni v. Compagnoni, 619 So.2d 450 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). We therefore reverse that portion of the judgment establishing the ar-rearage for reconsideration after the court hears the motion for modification.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

DELL, C.J., GUNTHER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

648 So. 2d 1264, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 628, 1995 WL 36163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolin-v-bolin-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack