Bolhorst v. State
Opinion
W. SHARP, Judge.
Bolhorst entered a plea of guilty to burglary of a dwelling,1 and grand theft.2 He argues the nineteen-year sentence imposed on the burglary charge exceeds the fifteen-year statutory maximum sentence for a second degree felony,3 and that errors were made in the sentencing seoresheet which would place him in a lower sentencing bracket. Specifically, there is no record support for the three third degree felonies which were scored as additional offenses at conviction and, in addition, a mathematical error was also made.
The state concedes error. Accordingly wé vacate the sentence imposed for count I and remand for resentencing. We affirm this ease in all other regards.
AFFIRM in part; VACATE Sentence; REMAND for Resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
640 So. 2d 1249 (Bolhorst v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.