Boley v. State

518 S.W.3d 234, 2017 WL 1149612, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 215
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 28, 2017·No. No. ED 104637·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Boley, acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boley v. State, 518 S.W.3d 234, 2017 WL 1149612, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 215 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

518 S.W.3d 234 (Boley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.