Boley v. State
518 S.W.3d 234, 2017 WL 1149612, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 215
Opinion
ORDER
James Boley, acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We find no error has occurred.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boley v. State, 518 S.W.3d 234, 2017 WL 1149612, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 215 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).
518 S.W.3d 234 (Boley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.