Boley v. State
518 S.W.3d 234, 2017 WL 1149612, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 215
This text of 518 S.W.3d 234 (Boley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Boley v. State, 518 S.W.3d 234, 2017 WL 1149612, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 215 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).
Opinion
ORDER
James Boley, acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We find no error has occurred.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
518 S.W.3d 234, 2017 WL 1149612, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boley-v-state-moctapp-2017.