Boley v. Roberts

72 So. 1023, 71 Fla. 660

• Court: Supreme Court of Florida
• Decided: May 31, 1916
• Status: Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted to the Court at a former term thereof, upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed; it is further ordered by the Court that the defendants in error do have and recover of and from the plaintiff in error their costs by them in this behalf expended, which costs are taxed at the sum of $-, all of which is ordered to be certified to the Court below.

Writ of Error to Court of Record of Escambia County; Kirke Monroe, Judge.

E. C. Maxwell and W. P. Whip, for Plaintiff in Error; John C. Avery, for Defendant in Error.