Boles v. Welch

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Boles v. Welch

68 N.W. 655, 94 Wis. 189, 1896 Wisc. LEXIS 134

DecidedOctober 13, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 68 N.W. 655 (Boles v. Welch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boles v. Welch, 68 N.W. 655, 94 Wis. 189, 1896 Wisc. LEXIS 134 (Wis. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Winslow, J.

The only serious question in the case is whether the evidence referred- to in the statement of facts was. admissible. It is said that such evidence tended to contradict the terms of a written contract, but we regard it as tending rather to show that in fact the covenants of the [191]*191written agreement had been paid and satisfied by work instead of in money. It seems clearly within the principle stated in Jilson v. Gilbert, 26 Wis. 637, and cases there cited.

By the Court.— Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winslow, J.

The only serious question in the case is whether the evidence referred- to in the statement of facts was. admissible. It is said that such evidence tended to contradict the terms of a written contract, but we regard it as tending rather to show that in fact the covenants of the [191]*191written agreement had been paid and satisfied by work instead of in money. It seems clearly within the principle stated in Jilson v. Gilbert, 26 Wis. 637, and cases there cited.

By the Court.— Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 N.W. 655, 94 Wis. 189, 1896 Wisc. LEXIS 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boles-v-welch-wis-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack