Boles v. Trenton Fire Clay and Porcelain Company
135 A. 883, 103 N.J.L. 483, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 204
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Katzenbach, in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, MinTURN, KaLISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LlOYD, VAN BuSKIRK, McGlennon, Kays, HetField, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boles v. Trenton Fire Clay and Porcelain Company, 135 A. 883, 103 N.J.L. 483, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 204 (N.J. 1927).
135 A. 883 (Boles v. Trenton Fire Clay and Porcelain Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.