Boles v. State

111 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 659
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 1, 1927
Docket8 Div. 527.
StatusPublished

This text of 111 So. 923 (Boles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boles v. State, 111 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 659 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

RICE, J.

The court has read the entire evidence in this case en banc. We fail to find anything in same tending in any way to connect this appellant with the possession of the whisky which was found near his home, but not on land under his control. It would be of no value for us to discuss the evidence. The appellant was entitled to have given at his request the general affirmative charge in his favor, and for the error in its refusal the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. . Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boles-v-state-alactapp-1927.