Boles v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Boles v. State

111 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 659

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Boles v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Ala. App. 356 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 1, 1927·No. 8 Div. 527.·Published

Opinion

RICE, J.

The court has read the entire evidence in this case en banc. We fail to find anything in same tending in any way to connect this appellant with the possession of the whisky which was found near his home, but not on land under his control. It would be of no value for us to discuss the evidence. The appellant was entitled to have given at his request the general affirmative charge in his favor, and for the error in its refusal the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. . Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

The court has read the entire evidence in this case en banc. We fail to find anything in same tending in any way to connect this appellant with the possession of the whisky which was found near his home, but not on land under his control. It would be of no value for us to discuss the evidence. The appellant was entitled to have given at his request the general affirmative charge in his favor, and for the error in its refusal the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. . Reversed and remanded.

Boles v. State, 111 So. 923, 22 Ala. App. 659 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

111 So. 923 (Boles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.