Boles v. Lynde
1 Root 195
This text of 1 Root 195 (Boles v. Lynde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Boles v. Lynde, 1 Root 195 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).
Opinion
[196]*196Judgment — Manifest error, for the reason ahoye assigned. The court had nothing to do in assessing the value of the seine, etc. in this prosecution — for the statute is that he forfeit the seine, etc. and not the value of the seine, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
C. J. Hendry Co. v. Moore
318 U.S. 133 (Supreme Court, 1943)
Gordon v. Trevarthan
34 P. 185 (Montana Supreme Court, 1893)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boles-v-lynde-connsuperct-1790.