Boles v. Lynde

1 Root 195
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided July 15, 1790·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[196] Judgment — Manifest error, for the reason ahoye assigned. The court had nothing to do in assessing the value of the seine, etc. in this prosecution — for the statute is that he forfeit the seine, etc. and not the value of the seine, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boles v. Lynde, 1 Root 195 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).

1 Root 195 (Boles v. Lynde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

C. J. Hendry Co. v. Moore
318 U.S. 133 (Supreme Court, 1943)
Gordon v. Trevarthan
34 P. 185 (Montana Supreme Court, 1893)