Boles v. Graham

105 S.E.2d 296, 249 N.C. 131, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 427
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 29, 1958
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 105 S.E.2d 296 (Boles v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boles v. Graham, 105 S.E.2d 296, 249 N.C. 131, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 427 (N.C. 1958).

Opinion

PeR Curiam.

The nonsuit removed the defendants’ objections raised by the first demurrer. They have abandoned their assignment of error based on the refusal of the court to require the plaintiffs to make their complaint more definite. They now present for review only that part of the court’s order overruling the second demurrer interposed in the superior court upon the ground the complaint failed to state a cause of action.

Appeal does not lie from an order overruling a demurrer in any case except where it is interposed as a matter of right for misjoinder of parties and causes. Prior to trial on the merits, an order overruling á demurrer for failure’to state a cause of action can be reviewed only [132]*132by writ of certiorari. Rule 4(a), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 242 N.C. 766. The defendants are here prematurely.

Appeal Dismissed.

PARKER, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McEachern v. Miller
151 S.E.2d 209 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
Guinn ex rel. Guinn v. Kincaid
116 S.E.2d 380 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 S.E.2d 296, 249 N.C. 131, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boles-v-graham-nc-1958.