Bolen v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Bolen v. State

1916 OK CR 106, 154 P. 276, 12 Okla. Crim. 607, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 112

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 11, 1916

DocketNo. A-2475.

StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK CR 106 (Bolen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bolen v. State, 1916 OK CR 106, 154 P. 276, 12 Okla. Crim. 607, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 112 (Okla. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On information filed in the county court of Nowata county, charging that in said county on the 11th day of November, 1914, the plaintiff in error, Harve Bolen, did unlawfully have in his possession intoxicating liquors, to-wit, one half pint of whisky and six one-half pintis of alcohol with the intent to sell the same, he was tried, convicted and sentenced to be confined in the county jail for sixty days and to pay a fine of one hundred dollars.

Prom the judgment he appeals. No brief has been filed and the case was submitted on the merits.

*608 3?rom a careful examination of this case, both as to■ the law and the evidence, we have failed to discover anything whereof the plaintiff in error has just right to complain. The judgment is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On information filed in the county court of Nowata county, charging that in said county on the 11th day of November, 1914, the plaintiff in error, Harve Bolen, did unlawfully have in his possession intoxicating liquors, to-wit, one half pint of whisky and six one-half pintis of alcohol with the intent to sell the same, he was tried, convicted and sentenced to be confined in the county jail for sixty days and to pay a fine of one hundred dollars.

Prom the judgment he appeals. No brief has been filed and the case was submitted on the merits.

*608 3?rom a careful examination of this case, both as to■ the law and the evidence, we have failed to discover anything whereof the plaintiff in error has just right to complain. The judgment is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1916 OK CR 106, 154 P. 276, 12 Okla. Crim. 607, 1916 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolen-v-state-oklacrimapp-1916.