Bolen v. State
This text of 968 So. 2d 624 (Bolen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mark Rochelle BOLEN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mark Rochelle Bolen, pro se, Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Charlie McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
KAHN and ROBERTS, JJ., concur; BROWNING, C.J., concurs in part and dissents in part by separate opinion.
BROWNING, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion, as to Issue Two asserted by the Appellant. The record in this case simply does not support a summary denial of Appellant's post-conviction motion. See Gillion v. State, 573 So.2d 810 (Fla.1991). Accordingly, I would REVERSE and REMAND for an evidentiary hearing on Issue Two, and I CONCUR as to all remaining issues.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
968 So. 2d 624, 2007 WL 3033512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolen-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.