Bolen v. BNSF Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bolen v. BNSF Railway Co.

473 S.W.3d 152, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 666, 2015 WL 3879664

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 23, 2015·No. No. ED 101342·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

BNSF Railway Company appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a jury entered a unanimous verdict in favor of Michael Bolen on his petition filed under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

BNSF Railway Company appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a jury entered a unanimous verdict in favor of Michael Bolen on his petition filed under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Bolen v. BNSF Railway Co., 473 S.W.3d 152, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 666, 2015 WL 3879664 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

473 S.W.3d 152 (Bolen v. BNSF Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.