Bolduc v. Granite State Fire Ins. Co.

83 A.2d 567, 147 Me. 129, 1951 Me. LEXIS 60
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided October 11, 1951·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

Plaintiffs’ exceptions to the rejection of a referee’s report awarding them a recovery must be sustained on the exception which challenges the authority of the Justice of the Superior Court who ruled on the motion for the acceptance thereof, and the objections thereto, “subsequent to the vacation” following the term at which such motion and objections were presented to him for action. That the exception was waived is immaterial.

The statute authorizing decisions in vacation on matters heard during term time confers no authority beyond that period which intervenes between the adjournment of one term and the opening of another. Robinson, Appellant, 116 Me. 125, 100 A. 373; Moreland v. Vomilas, 127 Me. 493, 144 A. 652.

The case must be remanded to the Superior Court for further appropriate action therein.

Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bolduc v. Granite State Fire Ins. Co., 83 A.2d 567, 147 Me. 129, 1951 Me. LEXIS 60 (Me. 1951).

83 A.2d 567 (Bolduc v. Granite State Fire Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Com. v. Kemp, W.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2018
Dumais v. Dumais
134 A.2d 371 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1957)
Inhabitants of Town of Owls Head v. Dodge
121 A.2d 347 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1956)
State, In re Adoption of Spear
91 A.2d 555 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1952)
Bolduc v. Granite State Fire Insurance
86 A.2d 81 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1952)