Bolduc v. Granite State Fire Ins. Co.
This text of 83 A.2d 567 (Bolduc v. Granite State Fire Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs’ exceptions to the rejection of a referee’s report awarding them a recovery must be sustained on the exception which challenges the authority of the Justice of the Superior Court who ruled on the motion for the acceptance thereof, and the objections thereto, “subsequent to the vacation” following the term at which such motion and objections were presented to him for action. That the exception was waived is immaterial.
The statute authorizing decisions in vacation on matters heard during term time confers no authority beyond that period which intervenes between the adjournment of one term and the opening of another. Robinson, Appellant, 116 Me. 125, 100 A. 373; Moreland v. Vomilas, 127 Me. 493, 144 A. 652.
The case must be remanded to the Superior Court for further appropriate action therein.
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 A.2d 567, 147 Me. 129, 1951 Me. LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolduc-v-granite-state-fire-ins-co-me-1951.