Boldt v. Brannon

Supreme Court of Florida

Boldt v. Brannon

969 So. 2d 315, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 684, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 2008, 2007 WL 3196477

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 1, 2007

DocketNo. SC07-563

StatusPublished

This text of 969 So. 2d 315 (Boldt v. Brannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boldt v. Brannon, 969 So. 2d 315, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 684, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 2008, 2007 WL 3196477 (Fla. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This Court initially accepted jurisdiction to review Brannon v. Boldt, 958 So.2d 367 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007), a decision in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified the following question to be of great public importance:

WHAT RIGHTS DO THE RESIDENTS IN A NEIGHBORHOOD RECEIVE, AS DOMINANT ESTATE HOLDERS UNDER AN IMPLIED EASEMENT CREATED BY A DENOTATION ON A PLAT MAP OF AN “EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS” TO A BODY OF WATER,

[316]*316WHEN THE SERVIENT ESTATE IS PART OF A RESIDENTIAL LOT ON WHICH THERE EXISTS AN OCCUPIED FAMILY DWELLING?

Id. at 368. After further consideration, this Court concludes that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI