Boldt

Court of Claims

Boldt

155 Ct. Cl. 822, 1961 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 166, 1961 WL 1559

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedNovember 1, 1961

DocketNo. 84-61

StatusPublished

This text of 155 Ct. Cl. 822 (Boldt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boldt, 155 Ct. Cl. 822, 1961 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 166, 1961 WL 1559 (cc 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Claim for indemnification as a victim of Nazi regime.— Plaintiff, a naturalized United States citizen, sues to recover an amount which he claims is due him as indemnity for wrongs he suffered under the Nazi regime and which was denied on his application to the proper German administrative agency established under a law passed in 1949 by the Allied High Commission in Germany. Upon consideration of defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition, and plaintiff’s opposition thereto, together with oral argument by the parties, it was ordered on November 1, 1961, that defendant’s motion to dismiss be granted and the petition dismissed on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claim.

Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration was denied January 12, 1962. Plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court, 370 U.S. 948. Petition for rehearing denied, 371 U.S. 855.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim for indemnification as a victim of Nazi regime.— Plaintiff, a naturalized United States citizen, sues to recover an amount which he claims is due him as indemnity for wrongs he suffered under the Nazi regime and which was denied on his application to the proper German administrative agency established under a law passed in 1949 by the Allied High Commission in Germany. Upon consideration of defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition, and plaintiff’s opposition thereto, together with oral argument by the parties, it was ordered on November 1, 1961, that defendant’s motion to dismiss be granted and the petition dismissed on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claim.

Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration was denied January 12, 1962. Plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court, 370 U.S. 948. Petition for rehearing denied, 371 U.S. 855.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 Ct. Cl. 822, 1961 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 166, 1961 WL 1559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boldt-cc-1961.