Bolds v. State

152 So. 3d 863, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20573, 2014 WL 7183270
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 18, 2014
DocketNo. 1D14-5400
StatusPublished

This text of 152 So. 3d 863 (Bolds v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bolds v. State, 152 So. 3d 863, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20573, 2014 WL 7183270 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

LEWIS, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 So. 3d 863, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20573, 2014 WL 7183270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolds-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.