Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Bolding v. State

Bolding v. State

89 S.W.2d 1005, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 763
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 22, 1936
DocketNo. 17874
StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.W.2d 1005 (Bolding v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bolding v. State, 89 S.W.2d 1005, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 763 (Tex. 1936).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at cofinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Since the conviction of the appellant on the 6th day of March, 1935, the law upon which the prosecution is founded has been repealed. See Guy Meadows v. State, 88 S.W.(2d) 481, opinion delivered Nov. 27, 1935.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meadows v. State
88 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.W.2d 1005, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bolding-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.