Boldin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Boldin v. State

266 S.W.3d 752, 371 Ark. 419, 2007 Ark. LEXIS 569

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedNovember 1, 2007

DocketCR 07-1024

StatusPublished

This text of 266 S.W.3d 752 (Boldin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boldin v. State, 266 S.W.3d 752, 371 Ark. 419, 2007 Ark. LEXIS 569 (Ark. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant John H. Boldin, by and through his attorney, am. filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, Dana A. Reece, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

Because Reece has admitted fault, this motion is granted pursuant to McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Danielson, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant John H. Boldin, by and through his attorney, am. filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, Dana A. Reece, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

Because Reece has admitted fault, this motion is granted pursuant to McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Danielson, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 S.W.3d 752, 371 Ark. 419, 2007 Ark. LEXIS 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boldin-v-state-ark-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack